Payments Testing
Solution Overview
Nearly 1 in 5 shoppers abandon a checkout because of bugs. Failed payments, declines and broken checkout experiences cost businesses more than $3 billion a year, and more than 85 percent of those failures can be detected and fixed before customers ever see them. The catch is that the test has to look like a real purchase.
Real-World Payment Testing from Test IO puts live transactions in the hands of testers in the markets that matter. Testers pay with real accounts and payment methods and report what happens at each step, from order submission through the payment gateway and bank processing to the payment method itself. Where testers don’t hold the right payment method, teams can lease secure live cards, run the transactions themselves and have a Test Coordinator reconcile the results.
Two models cover the work. In active testing, testers complete predefined transaction steps and report defects, receipts and recordings. In passive testing, your team uses live cards issued in the country and currency it needs. Both run on the Test IO crowdtesting platform, with a community of freelancers and EPAM testers, and defects flow into the bug trackers your teams already use.
Customer Challenge
-
Failed checkouts cost revenue. Nearly 1 in 5 shoppers abandon a purchase over checkout bugs, and failed payments, declines and broken experiences cost businesses more than $3 billion a year.
-
Synthetic tests miss real-world failures. Internal test environments can lack support for real local payment methods, and 3DS authentication makes full automation hard.
-
Regional payments behave differently. Local issuers, smaller e-wallets and 3DS methods are hard for non-local testers to cover, so each region needs testers who can pay the way local customers pay.
-
Personal cards don’t scale. Testing with them puts people’s own money at risk and can’t cover many countries and payment types.
-
The whole purchase cycle needs coverage. Order, delivery, return and refund all need testing, not only the payment step.
EPAM Solution
Failed checkouts. Testers run real purchases through the checkout flow, in pre-production and production. Failed, declined and blocked transactions come back as bug reports with steps to reproduce, screencasts and device details. Successful ones come back as purchase confirmation reports, so teams see which payments passed, failed or were blocked.
Synthetic test gaps. Transactions run on live payment instruments, so the gateway, bank and payment method respond as they do for customers. Test IO also handles one-time-password verification for leased cards, which removes a common blocker for 3DS checkouts.
Regional differences. Test IO Issuing covers transactions across major regions worldwide. Where issuing a card is not possible, a global tester community across 150+ countries is matched to each test by device, time zone, language and payment type to provide the necessary local payment method.
Personal cards. In passive testing, your team requests cards by type, currency, country and issuing bank. Card details arrive through an encrypted platform behind a passphrase you set. A Test Coordinator resolves card blockages and reconciles transactions each month, and only non-refunded purchases are invoiced.
Full purchase cycle. Digital checkout experience tests cover guest and registered user flows from order creation to payment across devices, payment options and languages, with a usability survey. Teams have extended the scope to delivery, returns and refunds, and added one or two countries a quarter.
Key Differentiators
Real Cards, Real Testers, Real Markets
Live transactions on real payment methods, not sandbox cards or synthetic data
Active and Passive Testing in One Offering
Testers run the purchases, or your team runs them on live cards that Test IO issues and reconciles
Secure Card Issuing Platform
Card details are transmitted via Test IO's proprietary encrypted platform, protected by a passphrase known only to you
Benefits
Protect Revenue at Checkout
Find payment failures before customers hit them
Catch What Synthetic Tests Miss
Real transactions surface issues synthetic tests don’t
Cover Markets Beyond Your Own
A tester community in 150+ countries, plus live cards on demand
Scale Testing Up or Down on Demand
Add testers, countries or payment methods as needed
Stop Testing With Personal Cards
Secure, compliant live test cards on demand
Defects Arrive Ready to Fix
Repro steps and screencasts sync to your bug tracker
Features
- Active payment testing: testers complete predefined transactions with their own accounts and payment methods, then submit defects, receipts and recordings
- Passive payment testing: your team runs transactions on live credit or debit cards leased in the country and currency you need
- Digital checkout experience testing: guest and registered user flows across devices, payment options and languages, with usability feedback
- Secure issuing platform: encrypted card sharing, passphrase access, a leased card overview, invoice requests and OTP verification
- Test Coordinator support: monthly reconciliation, card blockage resolution and 3DS and OTP handling
- Tester matching by device, time zone, language and payment type
- Purchase confirmation reports, pass or fail results and bug reports with steps, screencasts and device details
- Two-way defect sync with Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Rally and Zendesk
Use Cases
Retail: Global Footwear Brand
Problem Statement
After launching a new mobile app, a global footwear brand heard repeated complaints about payment failures that cost revenue. Its order cancellation process confused customers and added steps to returns, and the team needed to test the full cycle from order and delivery to return and refund.
Solution Proposed
An EPAM QA team built a payment testing process run by EPAMers and local freelancers. Test documentation and instructions were translated into local languages, and order cancellation was automated.
Achieved Results
Payment flows with location-specific options are tested regularly in the UK, US, Germany, France and Korea. The full cycle runs in each monthly release, with auto-cancellation when needed, and one to two new countries join the scope every quarter. The team reports a 100 percent defect containment metric for the last six months and a three-day maximum execution time for a reasonable scope.
Retail: Luxury Watch Retailer
Problem Statement
The retailer needed to confirm that its most popular and recently added payment methods worked on 21 country websites. Testers had to buy with real payment methods inside a fixed weekday window, and orders had to be canceled almost immediately so nothing shipped.
Solution Proposed
Test IO found crowd testers in 11 countries who used their own payment methods. For the other 10 countries, it issued Visa and Mastercard cards through a Stripe-based platform that stayed under its control and could be withdrawn when the test ended. A fake email domain, a shared delivery address and a test schedule visible to the client kept orders from shipping to testers.
Achieved Results
80 testers from 21 countries took part, and the client accepted 17 bugs.
Food Service: Global Quick-Service Restaurant Group
Problem Statement
The group needed end-to-end checkout and payment testing across 27 international markets. Its internal test environments didn’t support real local payment methods or cash alternatives, and 3DS authentication made full test automation difficult.
Solution Proposed
Test IO provided managed virtual cards in 27 markets and built card testing into bi-weekly regression cycles, feature testing and post-release smoke testing. Card transfers and monthly spending limits stayed adjustable.
Achieved Results
The team found critical pre-release payment defects, including declined transactions, incorrect amounts and checkout errors. It validated core ordering flows and edge cases such as take-away, drive-thru, curbside and table service across 27 markets, and retired risky sandbox test cards.
Financial Services: Private Bank
Problem Statement
A private bank wanted to test its banking application with real users while keeping strict application security and a restricted crowd geography. Testing spanned multiple applications and physical devices, and the test data and documentation were limited or outdated.
Solution Proposed
A dedicated team planned, designed and delivered end-to-end crowd testing that mixed exploratory and test case work on web, iOS and Android. Secure access came from direct distribution of mobile builds and whitelisted IPs through proxy and VPN solutions. A crowd-building approach balanced tester expertise with fresh insight from new joiners.
Achieved Results
850 test cases ran over 3.5 months. Testers found 470 defects over one year, using 240 unique devices and 197 unique testers.
Software & Hi-Tech: Global Ride-Share Service
Problem Statement
The service tested its checkout flow internally but lacked local payment methods for a full sanity check before releases.
Solution Proposed
Test IO ran passive testing, with cards the client’s team used internally, and active testing, where the crowd verified ordering a ride and paying on every new build. An encrypted platform shared card details with the client under a zero-access policy for testers and EPAM employees. Real user cards and cards generated through a Stripe integration were used.
Achieved Results
P0 issues are reported straight into the client’s Jira within 24 hours of a release.
Questions & Answers
What’s the difference between active and passive payment testing?
How is live card data kept secure?
How does an engagement start?
Which payment methods and countries can be tested?
Which tools does Test IO connect to?
industries
categories
license type
type
Unlock the solution in 3 easy steps
01
Reach Out to Us
Request the solution by submitting a short form
02
Sit Back & Relax
Our experts swiftly process your request and get back to you
03
Start Using The Solution
Dive in and unlock all the benefits
